|
Paradox
and the Nature of Mind
In looking at schools of spiritual thought, have you ever
noticed that the description of the ultimate nature of reality almost always
falls into one of two categories? Either the ultimate truth is that reality is
everything (we are all connected, and it is all one thing), or reality is
nothing (everything we see is an illusion and none of it really exists). What I
have realized from my own search is that both are equally true: life is
everything and nothing.
The universe has no problem with this paradox, but our mind (intellect, internal
dialogue, linear thought, language, personality) cannot understand it. Our
mind's gift is to discern one thing from another, to separate this from that.
The mind's faculties are built on rational thought; thus it lacks the capacity
to understand how one thing can be both itself and not itself at the same time.
Holding paradox is beyond the purview of our mind.
At first glance this assertion seems ridiculous. You may think you can hold
paradox in your mind. You can line up all the arguments for reality being
everything, and all the arguments for it being nothing, and hold them all in
your mind. However, those arguments only describe the concept; they are not the
paradox itself.
Here's an example: imagine a white chess piece, a castle. Now imagine the same
piece being black. See the white piece next to the black one. Now see the same
piece as a mottled combination of black and white. Now see it as gray. Now see
the black one overlaid against a white one. These scenes are all simple to
visualize. Now see the chess piece simultaneously as both black and white. See
not two pieces, but one that is completely black and completely white at the
same time. Can you do it?
Most of us cannot see both possibilities without separating the image into two
different chess pieces.
If you were able to accomplish the task above, what did you notice about your
mind? I suggest it was silent; there was no mind. In that silence nothing is
noticing anything, but there can be pure awareness of the chess piece as
simultaneously white and black.
This example is like a Zen koan. Koans quiet the mind because they play the mind
against its own inability to hold paradox. The closer you get to actually
holding it, the less the mind is actually functioning. When you reach out and
hold the paradox, the mind ceases to function at all.
If you are seeking the true nature of reality, this example presents a way to
use the mind to help instead of hinder you. Instead of accumulating knowledge,
take action to grasp each concept. Then find the paradox between that concept
and another equally valid one and try to understand how they could both be true.
Again, grasp each concept individually; then try to hold them simultaneously.
The moment you succeed, the mind is no longer in the way, and the true nature of
things is revealed.
c2008 Spiritual Integrity. Raven Smith is dedicated to sharing powerful shamanic
tools to help you live your purpose. He is a mentor in the Eagle Knight lineage
of Miguel Ruiz, author of Four Agreements. He runs Spiritual Integrity Coaching
with Heather Ash Amara. http://www.spiritualintegrity.com
[ Home ] [ Up ]
|
Publishing & Consulting